Andrew,
I stands corrected, but a lot of improved cases around here have the shoulder moved forward more than the headspace allowance.
For example one could keep moving the shoulder forward in a 30/06 until there was no shoulder left and still not get a seperated case if the head was against the bolt face on firing.Certainly the striker drives the case forward a bit but not all that much.
If I want to check headspace, which is rarely, I just put some paper between the bolt and the head and measure it when the bolt starts to offer resistance. I haven't owned a gauge for 30 years except a few that I made of brass.
I cannot recall ever seeing a seperated case in a Lee-Enfield that was due to excess headspace.
Say you want to check your Mauser Headspace
Moderator: Aughnanure
- Aughnanure
- Moderator
- Posts: 3133
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
- Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia
Then it would not be an "Improved" chamber but a simple wildcat that couldn't be used with factory ammo. The reason why a rimless round will fire even when the apparent headspace is excessive is due to the extractor holding the case head in position. Just ask anyone who has fired .308win in a .30-06, or .270 even.Aughnanure wrote:Andrew,
For example one could keep moving the shoulder forward in a 30/06 until there was no shoulder left
I've seen many case head separations due to excess headspace, mostly SMLEs and No.4s either fitted with the wrong bolt head, incorrectly fitted barrel or worn receiver shoulders; worn out clunkers condemned by the military inspectors (and sold as such) but then "arsenal reconditioned" for sale to the gullible.