Ciro-Flex camera

I started this forum for any collecting hobby and it turned into my camera collecting and using forum. I use it mostly to keep a record of my photo adventures. Nobody but me seems to have photo adventures that visit here....but however. I have so many cameras now that I forget which is which and which ones work and which ones don't. If you have cameras and adventures you would be welcome to post here.

Moderator: DuncaninFrance

Post Reply
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11548
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Ciro-Flex camera

Post by Niner » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:21 pm

I got this $25 camera recently. It uses 120 film and is built like a tank. The one I have was built sometime between 1941 and about the end of WWII. It's simple. No light meter. No self timer. But... it has a depth of field scale linked to the focus adjustment knob. It also has a distance scale as an alternative to using the big top focus screen with a magnifying circle to assist focus. Or you can use the square opening in the pop up sides to frame your shot.

I'll attach a few photos. Here is a link to the how to use it manual.

http://www.butkus.org/chinon/ciro-flex/ciroflex.pdf
Attachments
set up.jpg
DSC03073.jpg
DSC00117.jpg
4ft on scale to focus.jpg
DSC03074.jpg
magnafier.jpg
setting ring.jpg
top screen
top screen
window finder.jpg
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11548
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: Ciro-Flex camera

Post by Niner » Tue Jun 10, 2014 2:43 pm

So I shot a roll of film in my back yard...with a couple of shots in the house. I think I could have focused better and....maybe picked some better F stop choices. The light reading I got from using my Pentax K1000 worked out ok. I had bought a couple of light meters off ebay. But... one taking a battery skitters around with the battery but the readings make no sense. Another... A GE that works off of selenium also looks like it is working....but isn't. Oh well another total of $22 down the old drain. When one is in ones second childhood money is no object.

The photo adventure today was mostly a disappointment. And the major reason was that I played hell again getting the undeveloped film on the developing reel. I managed to scratch up about half of the shots before I got the reel full. That...and I managed to get my fingers on the emulsion side in a couple of them and screwed them up by leaving some evidence of it.

However.... this camera has more potential for some good sharp shots over the simpler Brownie.

And... if you aren't careful you can make some double exposures that can turn out interesting. Open up the last photo, the palm, in the attached photos.

The 120 film is Tmax 100. It has excellent grain to it. And... I have one more roll left. I'm going to practice up on loading some film on the reel before I give it one more try.
Attachments
This one is among the worst.  Taken inside without any flash. Misjudged the distance a little and a bit out of focus.  Screwed it up  <br />loading on the reel and there are a multiple problems from mishandling.
This one is among the worst. Taken inside without any flash. Misjudged the distance a little and a bit out of focus. Screwed it up
loading on the reel and there are a multiple problems from mishandling.
I think this one came out best...all things considered
I think this one came out best...all things considered
Not particularly interesting...but ok.
Not particularly interesting...but ok.
This one is ok...but perhaps should have shot at a little faster speed or with an F stop with more depth of field.
This one is ok...but perhaps should have shot at a little faster speed or with an F stop with more depth of field.
This is one that I managed to get my fingers on the emulsion side.  Notice the bright spots in the left lower portion. There are also scratches and other marks.
This is one that I managed to get my fingers on the emulsion side. Notice the bright spots in the left lower portion. There are also scratches and other marks.
This is really a double exposure.  If you look closely you can tell.  When blown up to full size it's pretty interesting in a strange way.
This is really a double exposure. If you look closely you can tell. When blown up to full size it's pretty interesting in a strange way.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11548
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: Ciro-Flex camera

Post by Niner » Sat Jun 14, 2014 4:05 pm

Got another reel. I have been using a plastic reel that adjusts for either 120 or 35 film. The film should load from the outside edge of the reel and work inward. The film slips under the guide ears on either side of the reel opening and then is pulled forward under some ball bearing catches for a about an inch and a half . Then all you do is work the sides forward and back on the axis of the reel spindle. The film loads itself. Simple. I can do it in the light with not much of a hitch. In the dark, in a changing bag, it's not nearly so simple. The film won't track or binds or fall out of the grooves or gets twisted up with the paper backing or ... any number of things.

So I got a conventional old time aluminum reel. The film clips to the center spool and then wraps into the spiral coils on out to the reel edge. In the light.... works fine.

We'll see.
Attachments
both.jpg
film on metal reel.jpg
film on plastic reel.jpg
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 10948
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: Ciro-Flex camera

Post by DuncaninFrance » Sun Jun 15, 2014 2:42 am

I used to use a plastic one for both 35mm and 120 with no problems. I did load it in my darkroom rather than in a bag which made it much easier.
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11548
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: Ciro-Flex camera

Post by Niner » Sun Jun 15, 2014 8:41 am

I think the biggest problem is the film is coming off of a spindle and is bent in a tighter spiral than the developing reel it's going on to. And there's the question of if it is better to pull all the paper backing off to start with or remove it as you put the film on the reel. Once the negatives are developed and hung to dry they become straight and are easy to put on a reel......but that's after the fact that the film no longer is needed on the reel.

One bit of advice goes, for the expanding reel, is that you bow the film from the edges from back about six or eight inches from the end before you try to load it. That straightens out the spiral enough to feed the coiled film onto the reel....... if you can find the reel starting places and get both sides of the negative into the proper tracks and then advance the film. And the front edge of the film needs to remain relatively unbowed so as to fill the tracks on both sides.

I know it's not impossible.....just my skill level is not very good. I have no problem...so far ...with the 35mm film. And...I have loaded one roll of 120 without much of a problem before......but that was a lucky thing.
Post Reply