August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times

I started this forum for any collecting hobby and it turned into my camera collecting and using forum. I use it mostly to keep a record of my photo adventures. Nobody but me seems to have photo adventures that visit here....but however. I have so many cameras now that I forget which is which and which ones work and which ones don't. If you have cameras and adventures you would be welcome to post here.

Moderator: DuncaninFrance

Post Reply
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11545
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times

Post by Niner » Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:50 am

A photo contest a hundred years ago today. In the Tacoma Washington Times. Notice the grand prize.
Attachments
contestKodak.jpg
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 10947
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times

Post by DuncaninFrance » Thu Aug 02, 2012 3:18 pm

OK but lets look a little closer.

Actual Average Income (year) in the USA in 1912...................................... $1,033

The equivalent today for $1 in 1912 would be $23.81.

The exchange rate £-$ in 1912 was UK£1 = US$4.87.

In Great Britain in 1913 ( I don't have a 1912 Almanac ) the cost of a Kodak Vest pocket Camera with a Zeiss Tessar lens was £5.15.0

Image

So...........doing the sums, this camera, in Tacoma in August of 1912 could have been worth about 2 weeks wages to the normal working man.

At today's conversion rate it would probably cost about $666.74

Not a bad prize if you think about it :bigsmile: :bigsmile:
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11545
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times

Post by Niner » Thu Aug 02, 2012 6:52 pm

You have a point. Back then money was worth something.

I just thought it a bit odd that there was a Kodak photo contest and the top prize was a camera. You would think whoever took a photo for the contest would already have a camera. But... now days..... most of us have plenty of toys and one camera isn't enough. Maybe the prize was a top of the line model that was much desired.

Found this earlier advertisement for a Kodak. 1898.
Attachments
ScanImage001.jpg
Post Reply