August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times
Moderator: DuncaninFrance
August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times
A photo contest a hundred years ago today. In the Tacoma Washington Times. Notice the grand prize.
- DuncaninFrance
- Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
- Posts: 10947
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
- Location: S.W.France
- Contact:
Re: August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times
OK but lets look a little closer.
Actual Average Income (year) in the USA in 1912...................................... $1,033
The equivalent today for $1 in 1912 would be $23.81.
The exchange rate £-$ in 1912 was UK£1 = US$4.87.
In Great Britain in 1913 ( I don't have a 1912 Almanac ) the cost of a Kodak Vest pocket Camera with a Zeiss Tessar lens was £5.15.0
So...........doing the sums, this camera, in Tacoma in August of 1912 could have been worth about 2 weeks wages to the normal working man.
At today's conversion rate it would probably cost about $666.74
Not a bad prize if you think about it
Actual Average Income (year) in the USA in 1912...................................... $1,033
The equivalent today for $1 in 1912 would be $23.81.
The exchange rate £-$ in 1912 was UK£1 = US$4.87.
In Great Britain in 1913 ( I don't have a 1912 Almanac ) the cost of a Kodak Vest pocket Camera with a Zeiss Tessar lens was £5.15.0
So...........doing the sums, this camera, in Tacoma in August of 1912 could have been worth about 2 weeks wages to the normal working man.
At today's conversion rate it would probably cost about $666.74
Not a bad prize if you think about it
Duncan
What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
Re: August 2, 1912 Tacoma Times
You have a point. Back then money was worth something.
I just thought it a bit odd that there was a Kodak photo contest and the top prize was a camera. You would think whoever took a photo for the contest would already have a camera. But... now days..... most of us have plenty of toys and one camera isn't enough. Maybe the prize was a top of the line model that was much desired.
Found this earlier advertisement for a Kodak. 1898.
I just thought it a bit odd that there was a Kodak photo contest and the top prize was a camera. You would think whoever took a photo for the contest would already have a camera. But... now days..... most of us have plenty of toys and one camera isn't enough. Maybe the prize was a top of the line model that was much desired.
Found this earlier advertisement for a Kodak. 1898.