Browning BAR Used at the Argonne in WW1

The forum for comments about auto rifles with military connections.
User avatar
24626151
Leading Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:12 pm
Location: East Sussex
Contact:

Browning BAR Used at the Argonne in WW1

Post by 24626151 » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:39 am

One of our association (HBSA) members has recently bought a house in the Argonne which makes gardening interesting. The last message from him was that BAR magazines have been unearthed in the layer of excavations dated to WW1. This would be either very late 1917 or 1918 so may prove or disprove peoples theories about what was and wasnt carried into battle by the Doughboys. I have no comments to make other than I am just the messenger!
I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy!
http://bashingbambi.blogspot.com
User avatar
Tom-May
Leading Member
Posts: 633
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:18 am
Location: Carshalton, Surrey

Post by Tom-May » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:01 pm

"...so may prove or disprove peoples theories about what was and wasn't carried into battle by the Doughboys..."
The US Forces of the Great War confuse me a little, Much of their kit was of foreign origin or design, not surprising given the circumstances.

What I can't understand is why the US Army standardised on the French Chauchat Light MG, which had to be retooled for the US round) rather than the (IMHO superior) Lewis Gun (originally designed for the US standard cartridge).

Confused.

Tom
The Truth IS Out There, The lies are in your head. (T. Pratchett - 'Hogfather'))
User avatar
Aughnanure
Moderator
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia

Post by Aughnanure » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:36 pm

Illogical decision so probably political or some politician with relativen in France with shares in the arms industry....

Cynicism comes easy :!: :!:
Self Defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.

Eoin.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11548
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Post by Niner » Mon Feb 26, 2007 9:58 pm

According to one source the French Chauchat was "trust into the doughboys hands" at French run training camps. According to this source 34,000 were used by US troups. Also says the Browning didn't get into production until February of 1918 and 29,000 were shipped to France and only only 4600, were used at the front. Reason it wasn't more used was because of Pershings "dictum"...Great Weapons of World War I by William Dooly, jr.
Last edited by Niner on Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Post by Woftam » Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:00 am

The theory I've seen touted on why the Chauchat was readily accepted by the US was the lack of equipment the US army had on hand in 1917 - "282 Maxim guns, 158 Colt-Browning M1896 machineguns and 670 Benet-Mercie 'rifles' - not an impressive collection".

By the way the same source quotes the numbers of Chauchat's as 37,000.

The Lewis gun was liked by the US troops (I believe the US Marines were actually equiped with it and the air force used it as well) but apparently those responsible for procurement had a set against it. Specifically a General William Crozier, Chief of Ordnance (former commanding officer of Captain Lewis - the man who refined the Lewis and got it manufactured) was apparently very much against it (or Lewis). So a political decision - point to you Eoin.
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Post by Woftam » Tue Feb 27, 2007 12:04 am

The theory I've seen touted on why the Chauchat was readily accepted by the US was the lack of equipment the US army had on hand in 1917 - "282 Maxim guns, 158 Colt-Browning M1896 machineguns and 670 Benet-Mercie 'rifles' - not an impressive collection".

By the way the same source quotes the numbers of Chauchat's as 37,000.

The Lewis gun was liked by the US troops (I believe the US Marines were actually equiped with it and the air force used it as well) but apparently those responsible for procurement had a set against it. Specifically a General William Crozier, Chief of Ordnance (former commanding officer of Captain Lewis - the man who refined the Lewis and got it manufactured) was apparently very much against it (or Lewis). So a political decision - point to you Eoin.
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 10948
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

THATS DOUBLE TAPPING WOFTAM!

Post by DuncaninFrance » Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:11 pm

:cool: :cool: :cool:
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Post by Woftam » Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:46 pm

That's a good thing isn't Duncan ?

Now if I could just get the No1 to do it :lol:
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
Aughnanure
Moderator
Posts: 3132
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia

Post by Aughnanure » Tue Feb 27, 2007 6:48 pm

Ha Ha, I get two points :bigsmile:
Self Defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.

Eoin.
DSchnopp
Regular visitor
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by DSchnopp » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:11 am

The US Army isn't always logical in it's weapon choices. They selected the M-16 self jamming peashooter as the nations battle rifle. They also dunped the 1911 pistol for the Beretta M-9. Nothing against the Beretta but IMHO, the 1911A1 was a very good service pistol.
1975-1977

3rd Platoon Co. A 1st/70th Armor

1977-1978
HHC 2nd Bde 4th Infantry Division
Post Reply