A12 Blackbird

This forum is to discuss aircraft and vessels, military or otherwise.

Moderators: Niner Delta, joseyclosey

Post Reply
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11776
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

A12 Blackbird

Post by Niner » Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:55 pm

Visited Battleship park in Mobile today. They have a few airplanes there too. Here is one that is faster than a speeding bullet.
Attachments
weight.jpg
a12.jpg
DSCN2100.jpg
DSCN2187.jpg
speeding.jpg
Last edited by Niner on Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Post by Woftam » Mon Oct 15, 2007 5:06 pm

Beautiful piece of machinery.

This followed the U2 as America's main spyplane did it not ?
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
Niner Delta
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 5001
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Sequim, WA

Post by Niner Delta » Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:39 pm

Yes, it took over many, but not all of the U-2 duties. There was also talk of using it in the role of a fighter, but that never came about. The most famous version of this is the SR-71 Blackbird, probably the most incredible plane ever built.

I saw one at an air show in California in the late '80s, he never landed, did a low pass and then poured on the power and went almost vertical and was out of sight in an instant. Yes, I was impressed.

On 3-6-1990, one flew from Los Angeles to Wash. DC in one hour and 4 minutes, average speed of 2,124 mph (3,418 kph).

How far can you go in 64 minutes? :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Vern.
:USA:

Peace is that brief, quiet moment in history.......... when everybody stands around reloading.
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11080
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

THE REASON WHY!!

Post by DuncaninFrance » Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:18 am

It is not used as a fighter is that if it travels faster than a bullet it would -inevitably - shoot itself down :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Post by Woftam » Tue Oct 16, 2007 3:57 am

Dead on Niner, it is as the SR-71 I remember it. Read an article on it years ago.

As to your question I don't think I could last 64 minutes at any one activity these days, let alone accomplish anything.

Now Duncan you're confusing your physics with your your logic again. It couldn't shoot itself down because by the time it caught up with the bullet (which was initially doing plane speed + lauch speed = bloody fast) gravity has kicked in and the bullet has very kindly dropped out of the flight path of the plane (bloody fast X wind resistance divided by the force of gravity = 27 feet per millisecond altitude loss = plane still flying).

The reason it wasn't used as a fighter was simply that at full throttle the window of opportunity for a shot was about equal to the attention span of a Californian.
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
DSchnopp
Regular visitor
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by DSchnopp » Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:57 am

Someone did fly through their own bullet stream and shoot themselves down back in the late fifties. They were flying a Grumman F-11A (F11F-1 back then) Tiger.

Dave
1975-1977

3rd Platoon Co. A 1st/70th Armor

1977-1978
HHC 2nd Bde 4th Infantry Division
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11776
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Post by Niner » Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:01 am

What's even more interesting to me is that it couldn't take off with a full load of fuel because the tires couldn't support the weight of the load. Had to take off and have fuel added by a tanker.

What about that Vern? That isn't a Ripley Believe it or Not thing , is it?
User avatar
joseyclosey
Moderator
Posts: 3918
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:48 pm
Location: UK

Post by joseyclosey » Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:25 pm

Duxfords SR 71 Blackbird...

Impressive machines!

http://aycu04.webshots.com/image/32403/2005004834943226893_rs.jpg[/pic]
Post Reply