Page 3 of 9
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:17 pm
by blackisler
The disapearing gun at Mount Victoria
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 6:20 pm
by Niner Delta
Taken 8 years ago at Falcon Field in Mesa, AZ.
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:15 pm
by Serenity
Coast defence south shields WW2
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 7:25 pm
by Niner Delta
Damon,
You got a 3624 X 2448 1.2 MiB picture to load.
That means Robert has REALLY made some changes. (nice photo by the way)
Vern.
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:43 pm
by Niner
Well....do you think I over did it?

Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:18 am
by Niner Delta
No, no..........I think it's great.
Vern.
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:13 am
by Serenity
i think its great makes life lot easyer for putting pics on coz im rubbish with comps
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 11:44 am
by DuncaninFrance
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 1:00 pm
by Niner
Duncan...the screen still won't resize a link that is too wide. When you have an image wider than the post screen it's best to use our attachment feature and get it all posted and if someone clicks on the attached image it opens to the size you meant it to be seen at. Otherwise...they have to download it to their computer and then open it...which is what I did to get the entire image. And most probably, most won't go to that trouble...or realize even it can be done.
I don't mean this to be critical...only for information purposes.
Re: SECOND PHOTO CONTEST
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:33 pm
by DuncaninFrance
Niner wrote:Duncan...the screen still won't resize a link that is too wide. When you have an image wider than the post screen it's best to use our attachment feature and get it all posted and if someone clicks on the attached image it opens to the size you meant it to be seen at. Otherwise...they have to download it to their computer and then open it...which is what I did to get the entire image. And most probably, most won't go to that trouble...or realize even it can be done.
I don't mean this to be critical...only for information purposes.
Sorry Robert but the image on my screen is only covering about 60% of the width so I don't understand what the problem is
