THE FIRST WORLD WAR as reported in the daily news

This is a place for veterans of military service to remember and reflect. War time or peace. Any service.

Moderators: DuncaninFrance, Niner Delta

User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11070
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by DuncaninFrance » Thu Dec 15, 2016 3:54 am

Niner wrote:Sister ship to the Titanic had been turned into a hospital ship. It hit a mind with a load of wounded and sick. Amazing enough, after staying afloat for something less than a full hour the actual loss of life was actually less than the newspaper story. The loss in drowned was 30.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-1/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic Cause of sinking is attributed to a mine.
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11754
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by Niner » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:55 am

Lloyd George isn't having any easy German peace. And everybody needs to get into the war on the home front for their own good and the good of the country he says.
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-8/
Attachments
Lloyd George.jpg
replace.jpg
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11754
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by Niner » Wed Dec 21, 2016 10:09 pm

Wilson sent all major warring parties a note. Basically stating that he thinks the fighting should end and that he would like to know what each side wants to stop the fighting. He didn't take sides with the earlier German statement of wanting peace.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-1/
Attachments
headline.jpg
subhead.jpg
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11754
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by Niner » Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:22 pm

Kaiser seems willing to give Wilson his view on what a peace treaty should look like. The British and French say...no way. We are going to crush Germany for starting the war and give them the licking they deserve.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-1/
Attachments
Kaiser.jpg
England part 1.jpg
England part 2.jpg
French headline.jpg
French part 2.jpg
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11070
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by DuncaninFrance » Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:16 pm

"Kaiser seems willing to give Wilson his view on what a peace treaty should look like. The British and French say...no way. We are going to crush Germany for starting the war and give them the licking they deserve. "
And I believe they were right to do so.......The only problem with the final outcome of WWI ( and no one could see it at the time in 1919 ) was to apply too draconian reparations but the US was a party to that as well.
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11754
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by Niner » Fri Dec 23, 2016 3:50 pm

It seems to me the US had already taken a side.Wilson's seeming interest in peace making was a limp wristed gesture at best. Big US banks had loaned serious money to the allies and not the axis. Big business was making war weapons and material for the Allies, and not the Axis, and making big dollars doing it. All US pretense of neutrality was just that....except for not participating in the fighting. On April 6, 1917...less than four months after Wilson's note to the warring nations... the US joined the allies against the axis. Hardly the move of a man with a one track mind to be the peace maker.

Wilson was an idealist no doubt and played the reluctant warrior...as opposed to Teddy Roosevelt who was the premier warhawk of his day and had urged the US to get actively involved from the get go. After the war, Wilson, true to his high minded self image, was the one who pushed for the League of Nations to settle disputes and prevent future wars. We know how that turned out. It was as useless after WW I as the United Nations has been after WWII.
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11070
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by DuncaninFrance » Sun Dec 25, 2016 2:37 pm

I brows YouTube regularly and I enjoy watching the old wartime documentaries. This one in particular is a little gem and could well explain the conflicts of the 20C!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2vLZqU_kIQ
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11754
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by Niner » Mon Dec 26, 2016 11:18 am

Headline on December 26, 1916. The Kaiser suggests a meeting of the belligerent nations at a neutral site to discuss a peace settlement.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-1/

Meanwhile in the Tacoma Times there is not rejoicing at the prospect of a peace settlement. A sober analysis states what's wrong with the seemingly hopeful proposal.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-1/
Attachments
headline.jpg
Washington.jpg
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11754
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by Niner » Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:25 pm

General Haig gilds the lily. A great victory. Just one problem... the Germans were still in place and their line hadn't been broken. Merely a temporary problem caused by weather it seems.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/ ... d-1/seq-7/
Attachments
headline.jpg
text.jpg
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11070
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: THE FIRST WORLD WAR THREAD.

Post by DuncaninFrance » Fri Dec 30, 2016 3:16 pm

All be it in hindsight BUT the battle was a success. It took pressure away from the battle for Verdun which it was supposed to do AND it bled the Germans of much needed equipment and manpower thus weakening their situation for the future.
I strongly recommend that anyone who has an interest in this period read a book by William Philpott called BLOODY VICTORY. The Sacrifice on the Somme and the making of the 20th Century . ISBN 978-1-4087-0108-9 It is 629 pages long and is well worth then read..............
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
Post Reply