Page 4 of 5
very nice
Posted: Fri May 26, 2006 10:33 am
by RGRWJB
It's always good to stir up some Mosin conversation over here.

Posted: Mon Jun 19, 2006 2:31 am
by KH
RGRWJB:
I agree, but I am sad

: Still waiting for the photos you announced

.
hello Karl
Posted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 9:54 am
by RGRWJB
The ole Digital gave up the farm after my last Finn trip. It's in the shop being repaired but I'll get those 91/30 pictures to you. The mauser style bayonet mount is really odd.
Re: hello Karl
Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:10 am
by KH
RGRWJB wrote:The ole Digital gave up the farm after my last Finn trip. It's in the shop being repaired but I'll get those 91/30 pictures to you. The mauser style bayonet mount is really odd.
Bad luck

. OK, I will be patient again

.
here it is karl
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:34 pm
by RGRWJB
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:34 am
by KH
Very interesting!! I will dig a little and compare some of the bayonet devices before answering.
BTW: In this thread there are nearly all of the holy grails of MNs.
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2006 11:57 am
by Yuri
Herr Wrobel,
It appears that the bayonet attachment unit is from a French rifle like a Berthier. Where would such a thing come from on a Russian rifle? Where French rifles used in Russian army units?
GERMAN
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:42 pm
by RGRWJB
One person guessed it was a german type bayonet lug.
Posted: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:47 pm
by Yuri
Perhaps that is some kind of modified Imperial German bayonet lug. The only thing that it looks like may be a Gewher 1888 bayonet attachment ring.?
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:34 am
by KH
Yuri,
as some rifles m/91 were modified with G88 front band during WW1 it could be possible here too, though not very likely, as this is a WW2 rifle. I asked for large photos of the front band to look for details, but it seems that up to now RGR WJB had no time to make them.