Page 1 of 1

P14 and No1 Mk111

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:57 pm
by dromia
Here's some pictures from Mr May of his nice P14 and No1 Mk111*.





I'll let him reply with the details.





Thanks for the pictures. :D;





http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... MLE3BB.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->





http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... MLE3AA.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->





http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... P1403A.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->





http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... P1402A.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->





http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... P1401A.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->

<p>http://www.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... _Badge.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->





Adam.





Why don't you visit .






Re: P14 and No1 Mk111

Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:00 pm
by blackisler
nice rifles ,thanks for sharing them.


Rob.

<p>

Re: P14 and No1 Mk111

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:20 am
by bradtx
Adam, Mk.III* or Mk.III. Lovely P14.





Take Care, Brad

<p>

No1 MK 111

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 9:49 am
by dromia
Away Brad, surely you know the difference by now. Volley sights, cutoff its a MK111. :loco:;





Apologies for the confusion it is a Mk111, did the post around the same time as I did the one about my possibly early BSA Mk111* hence my typing confusion, that combined with being stupid. :D;

<p>

Re: No1 MK 111

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 10:00 am
by bradtx
Adam, I felt that is what it was. Stupid? Hardly!!!





From the king of typos and clipped sentences! (We don't want to discuss my picture posting challenges, do we Mr. 'Let's re-edit <!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>another</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--> of Brad's photos?')





Take Care, Brad

<p>

Re: No1 MK 111

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:36 pm
by Tom May
The Mk III is a Lithgow, dated 1914, (numbers matching),on walnut (which pleased me) - I've wanted a MkIII for years.





The P14 (apparently a Winchester) was an 'impulse buy', the dealer had one for sale, the FAC had a space, the money was available and I couldn't see a CLLE coming my way in the immediate future, so why not? (The mauser action feels clumsey after the smooth repeat of an SMLE though).





Regards





Tom

<p>"The Truth is out there...The lies are in your head..." - Terry Pratchett (Hogfather)

Re: No1 MK 111

Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:16 pm
by Flaith
Nice rifles indeed and a Lithgow with such an early date is rare in itself, let alone having matching numbers. Most early L'gows had walnut, I don't remember if it came from England finished or if the blanks were imported.





Eoin.

<p>

Re: No1 MK 111

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 2:39 am
by dromia
Aye I thought Tom would have had all you Antipodean lads drooling with that early Lithgow. :lol:;

<p>http://www.photobucket.com/albums/1003/ ... _Badge.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END-->





Adam.





Why don't you visit .