This is the forum to discuss your classic US military rifles from the beginning of the age of smokeless powder through WWII.
-
24626151
- Leading Member
- Posts: 392
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 1:12 pm
- Location: East Sussex
-
Contact:
Post
by 24626151 » Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:08 am
Any more or less acurate to shoot with a wire stock?
-
NuJudge
- Contributing Member
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 8:01 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
Post
by NuJudge » Sat Aug 16, 2008 7:50 am
I don't consider the M1 Carbine to be that accurate to start with, but consistent head positioning becomes more difficult with the folding stock, so accuracy is likely to drop.
CDD
-
Niner
- Site Admin
- Posts: 11750
- Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
- Location: Lower Alabama
Post
by Niner » Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:28 am
Whats wrong with accuracy for its purpose? It wasn't meant for measuring minute of angle at 100 yards. It's a fine minute of bad guy rifle out that far and some more. It carries a lot of bullets, and is automatic as well as being a light carry.. Athough it was meant as a second line rifle, it had an advantage in rate of fire over k98's at a close range and more than just the airborne used them in the front lines by choice..
-
riptidenj
- Contributing Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:18 pm
Post
by riptidenj » Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:40 pm
I have seen exactly ONE picture of a U.S. soldier holding an M1A1 Carbine. Forget where I saw it, he is standing with his back to the camera watching a column of troops pass.