GOTM OCT

This is a forum for topics relating to all classic bolt action British design long arms.

Moderator: joseyclosey

User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

GOTM OCT

Post by Woftam » Sun Oct 25, 2009 10:20 pm

There are no excuses for being late this month so I won’t offer any. This months GOTM is the Lee Enfield No 5 MkI. Short lived but in my opinion a classic.

Developed as a shorter, lighter version of the No 4 for combat in close environments such as the British found in South East Asia the name Jungle Carbine was given as a marketing ploy by an unknown American and has well and truly stuck.

Another thing that has stuck with the No 5 is the myth of a wandering zero. Everywhere this rifle is discussed on the internet the myth pops up. Some profess to have shot many No 5s in their lifetime, sometimes with hundreds of rounds and never encountered it. Some say it was a story made up to hasten the demise of the bolt action rifle and facilitate the introduction of the semi-automatic rifle within the British military. Personally I don’t know what to believe but most myths have a grain of truth somewhere, maybe this one does too.

The No.5 began life as the ‘No.4 lightened rifle’ Development began in mid to late 1943. Production ended in 1946 officially although 1947 marked examples have been seen. Production ran to about 169807+ according to Skennerton at Fazakerley and 81327+ at BSA Shirley. It was to be manufactured in Canada but the orders were cancelled and other than a few prototypes nothing was produced.

.
My No 5 was produced by Fazakerley in October 1944. This makes it relatively early production with the first examples coming out in February of that year. The first 1,000 test rifles had an FE prefix with a 3 digit number. Following rifles used 4 digits, initially with no prefix then an alpha prefix starting with A and moving down the alphabet. After Z the double prefix was used down to AC, although Skennerton records an AF prefix rifle as having been examined. Shirley rifles commenced production in 1945 with a double alpha prefix and 4 digits.

Most differences between a No.4 and a No.5 are fairly obvious. The No.5 has a shortened for-end, a distinct butt with a sling loop on the side, a flash hider and a shortened handguard. The butt plate incorporates a rubber butt pad and various lightening cuts were also made to the metal components. More subtle changes were the rear sight being graduated only to 800 yards, the handguard is retained by a lipped ring, similar to but slightly different from the No.4 ring. Lightening of the bolt (drilled out bolt knob) and lightening of the trigger guard are also less obvious changes.
All up No.5 ended up 5 inches shorter and 1lb 14oz lighter than the No.4.

The No.5 also received a new bayonet with a bowie style blade. The bayonet bar was circular in cross section to fit the new bayonet and the muzzle ring significantly larger to fit the flash hider.

My No.5 from the right and left sides –
Image
Image

The distinctive flash hider –
Image

The rear sight, as noted previously graduated to only 800 yards. There was also a pressed metal version.
Image

A shot of the action from above. This rifle is one of the few I’ve seen with a No.3 bolt head.
Image

View of the beltway from above. Obviously there was more concern with function than looks.
Image

The lightened bolt knob. I believe this was also done fairly regularly by another factory (Maltby ?) although with a different diameter hole.
Image

Rifle is also marked with the rust stamp –
Image

While I prefer all matching rifles in the No.5’s case I made an exception. Woodwork, receiver and magazine all carry the same number but the bolt is un-numbered –
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Speaking of woodwork, the handguard is also lightened and there is also the previously mentioned butt with the butt pad and sling loop.
Image
Image

Some extraneous markings to the barrel and the butt. I haven’t come across a unit that fits the butt marking but if anyone has any information or guesses I’d be interested to hear then.
Image
Image

The lightening scallops on the barrel. I’ve been told the engraving of the serial number here was common practice.
Image

Finally the No.5 bayonet. In personal preferences I’d rank this only second behind the P1903 bayonet.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Almost forgot the obligatory bore shot –
Image

One shot I have failed to include (because I fogot to take it) is the side on shot of the action to show the lightening of the rear of the action under the rear sight. Looking at a No.5 side on one can see clear daylight under the rear sight unlike a No.4 where little daylight is visible.
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11752
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by Niner » Mon Oct 26, 2009 9:30 am

Another really good post. I'll add an example of the mysterious nosecap version. Seems the originals had no nose cap but later many of them showed up with the cap. The assumption going around is that it was an addition during various quirks of "improvement" by unknown government or governments. The improvers unknown to me at least.

Both of these are 1946 BSA models and come out of a bunch that Century imported into the country about 1999 or early 2000. They had been in South East Asia some place.
Attachments
closeup.jpg
cap.jpg
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11068
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by DuncaninFrance » Mon Oct 26, 2009 4:01 pm

Thanks G. That's one for my wish list but it would have to be a Cat 1 as I doubt anyone here would convert to .303 sporting!
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by Woftam » Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:50 am

Ah Niner,
yes I completely forgot about the nose caps on the fore arm. My understanding (which may or may not be correct) is that it was a British "improvement" to keep moisture out of the fore arm. But the application, as you say, appeared random.

Your wish list must be getting awfully long now Duncan :lol:
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11068
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by DuncaninFrance » Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:27 am

Your wish list must be getting awfully long now Duncan :lol:
Afraid so! List longer + bank account smaller = No Solution :roll:
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
joseyclosey
Moderator
Posts: 3918
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:48 pm
Location: UK

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by joseyclosey » Tue Oct 27, 2009 1:36 pm

Heres a couple of nose capped No 5s, only one is mine unfortunately, the top one. Its a 47 Faz.

The bayonet is also mine.

Joe :D



Image
User avatar
joseyclosey
Moderator
Posts: 3918
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:48 pm
Location: UK

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by joseyclosey » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:41 pm

Woftam,s inspired me to take a few more schnaps of my No.5 which i am ashamed to admit has been a bit of a closet queen this year.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

and not forgetting the 47 manufactured bayonet.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11752
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by Niner » Tue Oct 27, 2009 2:47 pm

Nice light tint to the wood finish. Has it been refinished to lighten up the stock do you think? Mine and Woftam's are of the more often seen darker stock.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by Woftam » Tue Oct 27, 2009 3:41 pm

Nice Joe, a late production one too.
Anyone else out there got one ?
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
PeterN2
Moderator
Posts: 1009
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: GOTM OCT

Post by PeterN2 » Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:21 pm

I have a No.5 but not a late one. Mine is a 1945 BSA. The finish on the right side is worn a bit from being carried slung alot.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Regards
Peter.
Post Reply