My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

This is a forum for topics relating to all classic bolt action British design long arms.

Moderator: joseyclosey

Post Reply
User avatar
Aughnanure
Moderator
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia

My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

Post by Aughnanure » Wed Apr 04, 2012 9:13 am

As promised elsewhere here's a few pics of my latest acquisition, a 1916 BSA Mk III* converted just post WW II by the Lithgow Small Arms factory for Slazengers.

Image

Image

Image

Picked it up yesterday the 4/4/2012 (now 9 mins past Midnight :D )

Fair bit of cosmetic rust which should come off with a bit of TLC and elbow grease; note the nice treatment of the foresight.

I'll post more photos as the clean up progresses.
Self Defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.

Eoin.
User avatar
Woftam
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1718
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 9:17 am
Location: Port Macquarie NSW
Contact:

Re: My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

Post by Woftam » Wed Apr 04, 2012 3:19 pm

I know they're a part of Lithgow history but they are an ugly gun.
The power of accurate observation is frequently called cynicism by those who don't have it.
Image
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11764
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

Post by Niner » Wed Apr 04, 2012 4:22 pm

Looks a bit like too much barrel and not enough stock. But..... should make it easier to keep the point of impact down when in an unsupported firing stance.
User avatar
Aughnanure
Moderator
Posts: 3194
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia

Re: My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

Post by Aughnanure » Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:46 pm

Woftam wrote:I know they're a part of Lithgow history but they are an ugly gun.
Very true and as Niner says more forend would look better and there was probably a good reason for the odd design.

Once I clean it up I'll do a bit of firing and try it with a longer forend.

I remember seeing some nice English conversions on MLE or MLM actions that had longer woodwork.

Edit:

Just went a Googling and found this Webley and Scott,

Image
Last edited by Aughnanure on Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Self Defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.

Eoin.
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11764
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Re: My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

Post by Niner » Wed Apr 04, 2012 10:09 pm

Dug up an old Springfield Sporters catalog. It had a Sporter .410 Enfield with a longer forestock. No telling where they got them. These rifles could use standard 3 inch 410 shells. They also had an Isaphore Enfield .410 in standard 1MKIII configuration that had only 2 inch chambers that wouldn't take the standard commercial shell cases. I guess these Isaphores were surplus riot police rifles from some Asian backwater or other.
Attachments
Musket.jpg
ScanImage001.jpg
PeterN2
Moderator
Posts: 1010
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:02 pm
Location: Yorkshire, England

Re: My 'New' 1916 BSA Mk III* .410

Post by PeterN2 » Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:08 pm

You can still buy 2 inch .410 cartridges here in the UK as well as the 2 1/2 and 3 inch cartridges.
Regards
Peter.

http://www.kirklees-guns.co.uk/page91.html
Post Reply