Enfield, Mauser or Mosin-Nagent.

This is a place to post about the classic Russian bolt action rifle.

Moderator: Miller Tyme

Post Reply
OneFreeTexan
Regular visitor
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:15 pm
Location: Texas hill country, Michigan's Golden Left Coast

Enfield, Mauser or Mosin-Nagent.

Post by OneFreeTexan » Thu Mar 02, 2006 2:45 pm

I have several Enfields, III"s, IV's and even a 5 carbine. Love to shoot them, even reload for them. Also have a few Swiss K-31's..Those are real 'one-holers', just a little more expensive to shoot.

See people who think Mauser's or 'Noisy-Maggots' are better. Is there something wrong with these people? I can't see why I'd want to start collecting anything other than English or Swiss; well I do like Czech CZ-52's also.

What do you think? :cool:
NRA Lifer
User avatar
Brass Rat
Leading Member
Posts: 909
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 11:24 pm
Location: Dahlonega, GA

Post by Brass Rat » Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:20 am

I own 5 or 6 Mausers but the only one I have fired in the past couple of years is my 1916 short rifle in 7x57 and I have only shot one of my Mosins in at least 2 years , that was an M39 I used in a match a few months ago and did really badly.

The only rifles I really regularly shoot anymore, in no particular order are

1) Danish Issue VAR barrel M1

2) BSA #5

3) Fazakerely #5

4) S-C 1903A3

5) 20" HBAR AR15

6) STG-58 on Imbel receiver
User avatar
Niner
Site Admin
Posts: 11750
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2003 1:00 pm
Location: Lower Alabama

Post by Niner » Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:47 am

Get a 1903A3 from CMP and you will see what improved sights will do for the Mauser design. Mausers and Nagants, in my opinion, were excellent designs for the time in which they were created.

I think most, probably all kinds of milsurp rifles, can be very good shooters depending on the shooter's eye sight and understanding of the particular weapons sight design and distance setup. For instance, the Finn Nagants get a better press than the unmodified Russian Nagants... but they have slightly improved sights and a modified trigger pull too. The chamber, the bolt, the rate of twist, the ammo....hardly a difference from what the Russian M91 or 91/30.
User avatar
dromia
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by dromia » Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:46 pm

Being the moderator here on the Enfield forum and an active prosletyzing champion of the best battle rifle ever designed and produced I have to agree with you.

Regarding Swiss, well I've never really gone down that route so cannot comment but they are very nice rifles.

My secondary interest are mainly .22" trainers and Martinis, Swedes, and early Breech Loading BP cartridge rifles.

I do think that this thread would be worth copying to the Noisy Moisy and the Mangy Mouser forums though, so as to get a fully balanced view on this.

:bigsmile:
ImageImage
SgtJethro
Contributing Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Ironton, OH

the best battle rifle ever designed and produced

Post by SgtJethro » Mon Mar 06, 2006 7:50 pm

Adam, old swabber of honey pots, you must be talking about the M1 Garand. Surely you are not talking about one of those archaic bolt jobs. :lol:

Jethro
MJ1
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 11:53 am

So what is the problem? Get then all!

Post by MJ1 » Thu Aug 24, 2006 8:09 pm

Yuri
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 7:00 pm

Post by Yuri » Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:11 pm

I have grown up shooting the Nagant rifles and pistols and they are simple and robust. I do however in my limited amount of expirence with other nations rifles have found the Enfield to be delightful to shoot. perhaps it is the rimmed cartridge but the rifles have all been flawless in operation and accuracy.
Post Reply