Am looking @ a circa 1940 BSA #1, Mk III*, that does not have the “ears” or “wings” on the upper hand guards by the rear sight.
Somewhere I read that this was a war time expedient? Or am out to lunch? Anyone know ‘bout this....
#1 Handguards
Moderator: joseyclosey
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 1:29 pm
- Location: Between No Where & No Place, WA, USA
#1 Handguards
Grand Poo Bah
WA ST F.E.S.
WA ST F.E.S.
- Aughnanure
- Moderator
- Posts: 3191
- Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
- Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia
Hi Ray,
I suspect that the "war time expedient" part may have been a 'local one, allowing a unit Armourer to modify, rather than replace, the guard in the case of damage.
As the 'firearms grade' walnut had to be imported and there is so much wastage in the manufacture of these hand-guards it seems logcal to remove the undamaged arm rather than to replace the whole unit (no high tech adhesives back then) and thus to save vital shipping space in a convoy.
The above is just off the top of my head with absolutely no authority (except the importing walnut bit, and we've been doing that since before Napoleon).
Tom
I suspect that the "war time expedient" part may have been a 'local one, allowing a unit Armourer to modify, rather than replace, the guard in the case of damage.
As the 'firearms grade' walnut had to be imported and there is so much wastage in the manufacture of these hand-guards it seems logcal to remove the undamaged arm rather than to replace the whole unit (no high tech adhesives back then) and thus to save vital shipping space in a convoy.
The above is just off the top of my head with absolutely no authority (except the importing walnut bit, and we've been doing that since before Napoleon).
Tom
The Truth IS Out There, The lies are in your head. (T. Pratchett - 'Hogfather'))