BRITISH ARMY GET GLOCK 17'S

This is the forum for general Milsurp gun topics that don't fit some place else.

Moderator: Niner

Post Reply
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11078
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

BRITISH ARMY GET GLOCK 17'S

Post by DuncaninFrance » Fri Jan 11, 2013 3:28 am

Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Aughnanure
Moderator
Posts: 3197
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia

Re: BRITISH ARMY GET GLOCK 17'S

Post by Aughnanure » Fri Jan 11, 2013 4:20 am

Quotes from the Guardian article,
The 9mm Glock is lighter and tougher than the Browning but above all much easier to fire – advantages that have already attracted US law enforcement agencies, including police forces, to the weapon. It can be removed from its holster and fired within a second. With the Browning it would take four seconds or more.
That is pure bull
"If I'm getting it out in under a second, I'm going to win it," said Marine Sergeant Steve Long, who has been deployed twice to Afghanistan as well as to Iraq and Sierra Leone. He tested the Glock in the heat of Brunei.

Speaking at Woolwich Arsenal in south-east London, where journalists and officials were invited to test the pistol, he described the decision to equip British troops with the weapon as a "massive step forward". He explained that with the Browning, a soldier had to undo the holster flap, flick the safety catch and draw a bullet from the magazine before firing a shot.


Which has got nothing to do with the pistol but all to do with outdated holsters and incorrect procedure and understanding of the mechanism of the Browning pistol, which is perfectly safe to carry cocked and loaded.


That said, good luck to the troops.
Self Defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.

Eoin.
User avatar
DuncaninFrance
Global Moderator Sponsor 2011-2017
Posts: 11078
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 3:08 pm
Location: S.W.France
Contact:

Re: BRITISH ARMY GET GLOCK 17'S

Post by DuncaninFrance » Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:54 am

What do you expect from the Guardian Eoin :roll:
Which has got nothing to do with the pistol but all to do with outdated holsters and incorrect procedure and understanding of the mechanism of the Browning pistol, which is perfectly safe to carry cocked and loaded.
Well I think the main reason is ano domini and the perceived need for the MOD to update an old weapon, no matter how good it is. I'll take one of the Brownings off their hands :lol: :lol:
Duncan

What contemptible scoundrel has stolen the cork to my lunch? -- W.C. Fields
"Many of those who enjoy freedom know little of its price."
You can't fix Stupid, but you can occasionally head it off before it hurts something.
User avatar
Aughnanure
Moderator
Posts: 3197
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:59 am
Location: Glen Innes, NSW, Australia

Re: BRITISH ARMY GET GLOCK 17'S

Post by Aughnanure » Fri Jan 11, 2013 6:27 pm

I'd take one or two myself, especially a Mk I.

The NSW Police were offered Brownings by the Govt. when they were getting rid of their revolvers (retrograde step) but knocked them back in favour of the Glock; said that the Browning didn't do as well as the Glock in the mud test.

The police need a mud test????? :) :) :)

A few NSW police have been shot mishandling their Glocks!!
Self Defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.

Eoin.
Post Reply